Releasing software under an Open Source License to Increase Business Value
Releasing software under an Open Source License can increase the business value of that software.
Why License as Open Source?
As a developer when I create software and license it to a customer there are a number of reasons why I might want that license to be an Open Source license. That is, that are a number of ways in which Open Source licenses increase the value of the software to me, the original author. This value points should be weighed against the value created by Closed Source licenses.
Open Source Need Not Equal "Free of Charge"
Software can be Open Source and fee-for-use and it can be closed-source but free-of-charge.
Examples:
Value From Increased Networking Utility
Many of the value propositions listed below derive from the idea of increasing the human networking utility of my software - that is, as under an Open Source license my software can be used to help create and maintain my connections to other people: developers, potential clients, collaborators, pundits, marketers, etc. and a great deal (maybe most?) of the business value available ("Total Value Available") is obtained through connections and relationships, so anything that promotes good connections to other people has potential business value which should be considered.
Closed Source software licenses act in some ways as barriers to creating and maintaining connections to people. Healthy relationships require boundaries, so this is not a question of all-or-nothing but rather one of degree and kind. A lot of what a Closed Source license does is to try and prevent a loss of value, as opposed to providing utility that can lead to an increase in value.
The value that a Closed Source license seeks to create or preserve is based on scarcity and secrecy. The Closed Source License seeks to create a barrier to understanding how the software works, and making it harder for others to reuse or modify the software. The Closed Source License is addressing the creators' fears that if someone can read the source code they will have an easier time creating a competing product, that it will be easy to copy portions of the code and reuse it without payment and that t will be hard to detect such violations. These are real issues and should be considered before releasing source code in any form.
Specific Kinds of Value Created or Increased by an Open Source License
Using an Open Source License for software I create increases its value to me by:
What can/should one put in a License that is part of a Software Development Contract? I am thinking here of things that specifically relate to adding value for the licensor, for example:
SEE ALSO
Some widely used Open Source Licenses:
Why License as Open Source?
As a developer when I create software and license it to a customer there are a number of reasons why I might want that license to be an Open Source license. That is, that are a number of ways in which Open Source licenses increase the value of the software to me, the original author. This value points should be weighed against the value created by Closed Source licenses.
Open Source Need Not Equal "Free of Charge"
Software can be Open Source and fee-for-use and it can be closed-source but free-of-charge.
Examples:
- Embedding the MySQL database in your product: It is Open Source, but you must pay for the right to embed MySQL in your product.
- Microsofts' Internet Explorer web browser is free-of-charge but is Closed Source.
Value From Increased Networking Utility
Many of the value propositions listed below derive from the idea of increasing the human networking utility of my software - that is, as under an Open Source license my software can be used to help create and maintain my connections to other people: developers, potential clients, collaborators, pundits, marketers, etc. and a great deal (maybe most?) of the business value available ("Total Value Available") is obtained through connections and relationships, so anything that promotes good connections to other people has potential business value which should be considered.
Closed Source software licenses act in some ways as barriers to creating and maintaining connections to people. Healthy relationships require boundaries, so this is not a question of all-or-nothing but rather one of degree and kind. A lot of what a Closed Source license does is to try and prevent a loss of value, as opposed to providing utility that can lead to an increase in value.
The value that a Closed Source license seeks to create or preserve is based on scarcity and secrecy. The Closed Source License seeks to create a barrier to understanding how the software works, and making it harder for others to reuse or modify the software. The Closed Source License is addressing the creators' fears that if someone can read the source code they will have an easier time creating a competing product, that it will be easy to copy portions of the code and reuse it without payment and that t will be hard to detect such violations. These are real issues and should be considered before releasing source code in any form.
Specific Kinds of Value Created or Increased by an Open Source License
Using an Open Source License for software I create increases its value to me by:
- Ensuring that I have the right to re-use the software for another project/client.
- Increasing the likelihood that my software will be widely used, and thus I will be known to a wider market, and possibly gain market-share and "mind-share."
- Increasing the likelihood that my software will be improved. I gain by being associated with the higher-quality experiences the users have, even though some improvements are made by others, as the original author, some of the goodness rubs off on me.
- Making it easier to use my software as a marketing tool - I can show the code to prospective clients and collaborators and partners. Increasing the human-networking utility of my software is a
- Making it easier to incorporate other Open Source Software into my product, thus giving me a much wider range of options for adding features and making improvements, so I can respond to change requests and new opportunities much faster than if any change had to be implemented de novo.
- Providing an effective avenue for the widest possible expert review of the softwares' security. For example, Open Source software that handles vote counting will likely inspire higher confidence and thus have a greater value.
What can/should one put in a License that is part of a Software Development Contract? I am thinking here of things that specifically relate to adding value for the licensor, for example:
- Non-exclusivity. Licensor can use the software for other projects.
- Licensor has the right to list the Licensee in marketing materials (e.g. a web site) as a Licensee of the Software.
- Prescribing a mechanism for Licensee to "post-back" changes to the software.
SEE ALSO
Some widely used Open Source Licenses:
- apache http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
- artistic http://opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php
- bsd http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
- gpl http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.php
- lgpl http://www.opensource.org/licenses/lgpl-license.php
- mit http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
- mozilla http://opensource.org/licenses/mozilla1.1.php
- perl http://dev.perl.org/licenses/
Technorati Tags: marketing, open source, software development
posted by Matisse Enzer at 10:49 PM
0 comments
links to this post
